Guest blog by David Howie, Ph.D., Senior Advisor,
Global Financial Services Advisory Services Practice, TPI
A few weeks ago Shawn McCray wrote in this space about
what he called "Frankenstein Sourcing", in which a number of separate sourcing
models are used within the same company or even the same business unit without
any attempt at alignment.
Unfortunately, this monster is all too prevalent. The
danger is not so much that it leads to immediate disaster. If that were true
such sourcing would not be so common. On the contrary, each of these sourcing
relationships can appear to be quite successful, particularly within the
short horizon that is too often the concern of managers (and the
timeframe for incentive schemes).
The problem is rather that by focusing on discrete
chunks of sourcing, the greater benefits of a more coordinated approach are
squandered. Further, while often initially delivering results, this approach
easily leads to a dysfunctional operating model that locks in existing
inefficiencies without addressing the root causes of poor performance or the
future needs of the business. Five years down the line the company can end up
with such a complex and inflexible operating model that it is effectively
unable to respond to changes in the market or threats from newer or more nimble
competitors.
The solution? A strategic approach to sourcing that
connects a company's operational base to its business aspirations. This is
easier said than done, of course. Sourcing decisions are often made narrowly,
in response to local conditions or as a quick-fix reaction to the next set of
business targets. So coordination across the business is critical, as is the
freedom to take a longer-term view and to focus on future flexibility as well
as, rather than solely, on immediate cost savings. Ultimate success – as with
so many large projects – depends on building a genuine mandate for
change among senior executives.